SEOHosting.com Logo
Subscribe to us!

Why are SiteProNews and DropJack Comment Spamming?

Written by: Tyler Banfield on October 29, 2008 – 4:22 am
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

When I was going through the SEO Hosting comments that were being held in moderation, I came across these two gems:

SiteProNews DropJack Spam Comments

Normally, comment spam doesn’t get my attention, but I thought it was strange to receive comment spam from the same IP address for two social communities (instead of the normal pharmaceutical spam).

Out of pure curiousity, I decided to run the IP address through the DomainTools Whois.  The IP address resolved to TATACOMM-IN, which is an ISP in India.  If you have ever visited the services forum of a forum like Digital Point, you know how many individuals and companies there are in India that offer “mass blog commenting” services.

Because it seemed unlikely that an individual or company in India would randomly submit comment spam on behalf of two social communities, I wanted to see if there was any relation between SiteProNews and DropJack.  I began by using SEOQuake to see if the two sites were hosted on a shared IP address; however, DropJack has its own IP address and the only other website on the SiteProNews website is a domain that redirects back to SiteProNews.

Although they had individual IP addresses, I noticed something interesting when I pulled up DropJack in Yahoo! Site Explorer:

DropJack Site Explorer

After checking the footer of SiteProNews, I found out that both websites are a part of the Jayde Online Network.  According to their homepage:

“Jayde Online, Inc. was incorporated in March, 1998 and the Jayde Online Network launched in 2001. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, with reach all across the globe, the Jayde Online Network (“Jayde Online” or “the Company”) has become a one-stop repository of practical information and useful applications for those seeking to enhance their web sites and/or understanding of web-based business and trends.”

After reading this statement, I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt, so I decided to see if this was an isolated incident.  The easiest way to do this is by checking for traces of other spam.  Since the same anchor text was used in both comments, I decided to Google the phrase “start social networking.”  And lo and behold, guess who showed up at position #36?

DropJack SERPs

If you’re scratching your head and wondering how they ranked for a phrase that doesn’t appear on their page, just ask Google’s cache:

DropJack Google Cache

DropJack Start Social Networking

And, although it wasn’t ranked as high as DropJack, the SPN Community showed up in the SERPs for the same term between 200 and 300.  Once again, it was ranked solely because of external anchor text:

SiteProNews Cache

SiteProNews Start Social Networking

Just to be clear, I didn’t write this post to give SPN and DropJack a lecture on comment spamming.  Instead, I wanted to get an important point across to all of our readers.  If you thought that what you do online is anonymous, I hope this post showed you otherwise.  If you’re tempted to dabble in anything questionable, think about the impact it’s going to have on your reputation if you get caught.

To end on a light note, for a company that touts itself as “a one-stop repository of practical information and useful applications for those seeking to enhance their web sites and/or understanding of web-based business and trends,” you think they would at least invest their time in spamming for a keyword phrase that actually gets some traffic ;)

AdWords Keyword Tool Data

Update: Ironically enough, these comments came through after I published this post:

More Comment Spam

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Bookmark and Share:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Most Commented Posts

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

5 Responses to “Why are SiteProNews and DropJack Comment Spamming?”

  1. Gerald Weber Says:

    “To end on a light note, for a company that touts itself as “a one-stop repository of practical information and useful applications for those seeking to enhance their web sites and/or understanding of web-based business and trends,” you think they would at least invest their time in spamming for a keyword phrase that actually gets some traffic”

    LMFAO! ;-)

    The comment spam I get on my blogs never sees the light of day either but it never occured to me to look up the spammers. ha ha. Very interesting research.

    This example also illustrates the importance of anchor text in links however comment spamming of course is not the correct way to establish these links.

  2. Tyler Banfield Says:

    “This example also illustrates the importance of anchor text in links however comment spamming of course is not the correct way to establish these links.”

    Exactly. People worry about racking up lots of backlinks, but in reality, a small amount of anchor text rich backlinks from the right sources can be quite powerful.

  3. BuidaTogBuide Says:

    Thak you for the news

  4. clickfire Says:

    I’m surprised if SPN intended to do this. I think a lot of companies don’t put the time and effort into link building they should, so they end up outsourcing to a firm that promises X amount of links. The problem is that they don’t know the details of how the program will work until it is too late and brand damage has occurred.

  5. Angelo Saccone Says:

    Outstanding write-up, this is very similar to a site that I have. Please check it out sometime and feel free to leave me a comenet on it and tell me what you think. Im always looking for feedback.

Leave a Reply




©2008 SEO Hosting (HostGator.com LLC)