Secondly, I think that people do have a right to get upset when free services change their ways. While their moral outrage should certainly be far less than had they been paying for the service, people do invest time and energy into a Web 2.0 site. Moreover, Web 2.0 sites profit from their membership, with or without payments; and in many cases, their product/service would be useless without their membership interaction. Because Web 2.0 sites like Digg are reliant upon their membership as not only consumers, but important content providers, there is room for those participating members to voice opposition to drastic changes.